Comments on: Police use car vs. pedestrian crash to counter critics, warn walkers

By: One who knows

One who knows — Thu, 21 Jan 2010 22:47:19 +0000

I believe that the police should check the vision of the driver. Assuming the driver is whom I have been lead to believe it is, he has extremely poor vision and should no longer be driving. He was also in an exhausted state which is not illegal, but may have contributed to reduced reflexes.

By: Infra

Infra — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 16:55:59 +0000

How can sustainability be accomplished in Savannah and in other American towns and cities? Share your triumphs and struggles today at http://www.infrastructureusa.org, and join the dialogue on all infrastructure development.

By: MikeB

MikeB — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:33:43 +0000

Does anyone know? Has the driver that killed the Swedish tourist been cited? All this hoopla seems to have driven that question away.

By: DMKY

DMKY — Wed, 24 Jun 2009 05:45:33 +0000

Crosswalks are the ghettos of the unmotorized untouchables. They are shoddy and inconvenient. A person on foot has equal rights as motorists to speedy travel without senseless delay. Given their lower environmental impact and their unlikelyhood of depriving others of essential liberty (life), they arguably have higher priority. The only moral action a person can take is to disregard crosswalks and J-walk.

-Off the Reservation in KY

By: Fibes

Fibes — Tue, 23 Jun 2009 19:58:45 +0000

Excatly what we need, smug police officers protecting idiots from themselves. I’m not sure which part of “to serve and protect” this behaviour comes from but I am positive that the effort is something a private company would be impeached for.
It appears to be a good time to rob, cheat, steal, murder and pillage: unfortunately some of us have important work to do.
What’s step 3 in the “run people out of Savannah” campaign?