<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Focusing on a single goal will not mean success for Project DeRenne</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sustainablesavannah.com/transportation/focusing-on-a-single-goal-will-not-mean-success-for-project-derenne/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sustainablesavannah.com/transportation/focusing-on-a-single-goal-will-not-mean-success-for-project-derenne/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:24:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: prodgers</title>
		<link>http://sustainablesavannah.com/transportation/focusing-on-a-single-goal-will-not-mean-success-for-project-derenne/comment-page-1/#comment-1383</link>
		<dc:creator>prodgers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 14:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sustainablesavannah.com/?p=1113#comment-1383</guid>
		<description>You make a good point. It&#039;s funny how the &quot;Project&quot; means something different for everyone involved. (Not funny &#039;haha&#039;, funny peculiar). Ask a commuter, someone who lives in that neighborhood, an out of town expert, or a local public official, and all will state a different objective. Traffic calming vs. traffic volume increasing; neighborhood quality of life vs. higher allowable speed. 

When Dan Burden was in town, wasn&#039;t his angle that with a greenspace median, fewer traffic lights, and lower overall speed, there could be a compromise between higher traffic volume and neighborhood quality? Although the city brought him here, I wonder whether his message will carry over beyond his visit. His sensibility is probably counter-intuitive to the common wisdom of the  average commuting hospital staffer, but it does seem like the only win-win on the table at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make a good point. It&#8217;s funny how the &#8220;Project&#8221; means something different for everyone involved. (Not funny &#8216;haha&#8217;, funny peculiar). Ask a commuter, someone who lives in that neighborhood, an out of town expert, or a local public official, and all will state a different objective. Traffic calming vs. traffic volume increasing; neighborhood quality of life vs. higher allowable speed. </p>
<p>When Dan Burden was in town, wasn&#8217;t his angle that with a greenspace median, fewer traffic lights, and lower overall speed, there could be a compromise between higher traffic volume and neighborhood quality? Although the city brought him here, I wonder whether his message will carry over beyond his visit. His sensibility is probably counter-intuitive to the common wisdom of the  average commuting hospital staffer, but it does seem like the only win-win on the table at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
